Multi-step methods such as Retrace($\lambda$) and $n$-step $Q$-learning have become a crucial component of modern deep reinforcement learning agents. These methods are often evaluated as a part of bigger architectures and their evaluations rarely include enough samples to draw statistically significant conclusions about their performance. This type of methodology makes it difficult to understand how particular algorithmic details of multi-step methods influence learning. In this paper we combine the $n$-step action-value algorithms Retrace, $Q$-learning, Tree Backup, Sarsa, and $Q(\sigma)$ with an architecture analogous to DQN. We test the performance of all these algorithms in the mountain car environment; this choice of environment allows for faster training times and larger sample sizes. We present statistical analyses on the effects of the off-policy correction, the backup length parameter $n$, and the update frequency of the target network on the performance of these algorithms. Our results show that (1) using off-policy correction can have an adverse effect on the performance of Sarsa and $Q(\sigma)$; (2) increasing the backup length $n$ consistently improved performance across all the different algorithms; and (3) the performance of Sarsa and $Q$-learning was more robust to the effect of the target network update frequency than the performance of Tree Backup, $Q(\sigma)$, and Retrace in this particular task.

本论文对多步方法在深度强化学习中的表现进行了测试和分析，将包括Retrace和Q-learning等等在内的各种算法与DQN进行比较，在山车环境下进行了许多测试，指出需要注意调整backup length参数和target network更新的频率等细节来提高Q-learning等算法的性能。

多步深度强化学习的理解：对DQN目标的系统研究