As our submission for track three of the AI for Global Climate Cooperation (AI4GCC) competition, we propose a negotiation protocol for use in the RICE-N climate-economic simulation. Our proposal seeks to address the challenges of carbon leakage through methods inspired by the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and Climate Clubs (CC). We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by comparing simulated outcomes to representative concentration pathways (RCP) and shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP). Our protocol results in a temperature rise comparable to RCP 3.4/4.5 and SSP 2. Furthermore, we provide an analysis of our protocol's World Trade Organization compliance, administrative and political feasibility, and ethical concerns. We recognize that our proposal risks hurting the least developing countries, and we suggest specific corrective measures to avoid exacerbating existing inequalities, such as technology sharing and wealth redistribution. Future research should improve the RICE-N tariff mechanism and implement actions allowing for the aforementioned corrective measures.

我们提出了一种用于RICE-N气候经济模拟的谈判协议，通过借鉴碳边境调整机制（CBAM）和气候俱乐部（CC）的方法来解决碳泄露问题。我们通过将模拟结果与代表性浓度路径（RCP）和共享社会经济路径（SSP）进行比较，证明了我们方法的有效性。我们的协议产生的温度上升与RCP 3.4/4.5和SSP 2相当。此外，我们对我们协议的世界贸易组织合规性、行政和政治可行性以及伦理问题进行了分析。我们意识到我们的提议可能会对最不发达国家造成伤害，因此我们建议采取特定的纠正措施，如技术共享和财富重新分配，以避免加剧现有的不平等问题。未来的研究应该改进RICE-N关税机制，并实施允许上述纠正措施的行动。

AI4GCC - 团队: 在海平面以下: 分数与真实世界的相关性