Domain experts often possess valuable physical insights that are overlooked in fully automated decision-making processes such as Bayesian optimisation. In this article we apply high-throughput (batch) Bayesian optimisation alongside anthropological decision theory to enable domain experts to influence the selection of optimal experiments. Our methodology exploits the hypothesis that humans are better at making discrete choices than continuous ones and enables experts to influence critical early decisions. At each iteration we solve an augmented multi-objective optimisation problem across a number of alternate solutions, maximising both the sum of their utility function values and the determinant of their covariance matrix, equivalent to their total variability. By taking the solution at the knee point of the Pareto front, we return a set of alternate solutions at each iteration that have both high utility values and are reasonably distinct, from which the expert selects one for evaluation. We demonstrate that even in the case of an uninformed practitioner, our algorithm recovers the regret of standard Bayesian optimisation.

通过高通量（批处理）贝叶斯优化和人类决策理论，本文提出一种方法，使领域专家能够影响最优实验的选择。该方法旨在解决人类在离散选择上比连续选择更擅长的假设，并在每次迭代中通过求解增广多目标优化问题返回备选解集合，从中专家选择一个进行评估。研究表明，即使在无经验的情况下，该算法仍能恢复标准贝叶斯优化的遗憾。

专家引导的贝叶斯优化方法用于已知系统的人机交互式实验设计