Previous discussions have highlighted the need for generative AI tools to become more culturally sensitive, yet often neglect the complexities of handling content about minorities, who are perceived differently across cultures and religions. Our study examined how two generative AI systems respond to homophobic statements with varying cultural and religious context information. Findings showed ChatGPT 3.5's replies exhibited cultural relativism, in contrast to Bard's, which stressed human rights and provided more support for LGBTQ+ issues. Both demonstrated significant change in responses based on contextual information provided in the prompts, suggesting that AI systems may adjust in their responses the degree and forms of support for LGBTQ+ people according to information they receive about the user's background. The study contributes to understanding the social and ethical implications of AI responses and argues that any work to make generative AI outputs more culturally diverse requires a grounding in fundamental human rights.

这项研究调查了两个生成型人工智能系统对于具有不同文化和宗教背景信息的恐同言论的反应。研究结果发现，ChatGPT 3.5的回复表现出文化相对主义，而Bard则强调人权并对LGBTQ+问题提供更多支持。两者在回复中对于不同背景信息的调整显示了显著的变化，暗示AI系统在对于LGBTQ+人群的支持程度和方式上可能会根据所接收到的用户背景信息作出调整。该研究有助于理解AI回应的社会和伦理意义，并认为使生成型AI输出在文化上更多样化的努力需要以基本的人权为基础。

探索机器生成的AI回答中LGBTQ+偏见在不同国家和宗教背景下的体现