Exemplification is a process by which writers explain or clarify a concept by
providing an example. While common in all forms of writing, exemplification is
particularly useful in the task of long-form question answering (LFQA), where a
complicated answer can be made more understandable through simple examples. In
this paper, we provide the first computational study of exemplification in QA,
performing a fine-grained annotation of different types of examples (e.g.,
hypotheticals, anecdotes) in three corpora. We show that not only do
state-of-the-art LFQA models struggle to generate relevant examples, but also
that standard evaluation metrics such as ROUGE are insufficient to judge
exemplification quality. We propose to treat exemplification as a
\emph{retrieval} problem in which a partially-written answer is used to query a
large set of human-written examples extracted from a corpus. Our approach
allows a reliable ranking-type automatic metrics that correlates well with
human evaluation. A human evaluation shows that our model's retrieved examples
are more relevant than examples generated from a state-of-the-art LFQA model.

本研究探讨了如何在长篇问答中使用实例来解释和澄清概念，并提出了一个将举例作为文章的检索问题，并使用大量人工撰写的文章示例对其进行评估的自动评估方法，该方法与人工评估具有良好的一致性。