Which fairness metrics are appropriately applicable in your contexts? There
may be instances of discordance regarding the perception of fairness, even when
the outcomes comply with established fairness metrics. Several surveys have
been conducted to evaluate fairness metrics with human perceptions of fairness.
However, these surveys were limited in scope, including only a few hundred
participants within a single country. In this study, we conduct an
international survey to evaluate the appropriateness of various fairness
metrics in decision-making scenarios. We collected responses from 1,000
participants in each of China, France, Japan, and the United States, amassing a
total of 4,000 responses, to analyze the preferences of fairness metrics. Our
survey consists of three distinct scenarios paired with four fairness metrics,
and each participant answers their preference for the fairness metric in each
case. This investigation explores the relationship between personal attributes
and the choice of fairness metrics, uncovering a significant influence of
national context on these preferences.

通过国际调查了解公平指标的适用性，探索了个人属性与公平指标选择之间的关系，并发现国家背景对这些偏好具有重要影响。