In the field of evolutionary computation, one of the most challenging topics
is algorithm selection. Knowing which heuristics to use for which optimization
problem is key to obtaining high-quality solutions. We aim to extend this
research topic by taking a first step towards a selection method for adaptive
CMA-ES algorithms. We build upon the theoretical work done by van Rijn
\textit{et al.} [PPSN'18], in which the potential of switching between
different CMA-ES variants was quantified in the context of a modular CMA-ES
framework.
We demonstrate in this work that their proposed approach is not very
reliable, in that implementing the suggested adaptive configurations does not
yield the predicted performance gains. We propose a revised approach, which
results in a more robust fit between predicted and actual performance. The
adaptive CMA-ES approach obtains performance gains on 18 out of 24 tested
functions of the BBOB benchmark, with stable advantages of up to 23\%. An
analysis of module activation indicates which modules are most crucial for the
different phases of optimizing each of the 24 benchmark problems. The module
activation also suggests that additional gains are possible when including the
(B)IPOP modules, which we have excluded for this present work.

本研究针对进化计算领域中的算法选择问题，通过提出一种自适应 CMA-ES 算法的选择方式并测试，取得了比之前研究更稳健的结果，证明了模块选择对于不同优化问题的关键作用。