An Artificially Intelligent system (an AI) has debatable personhood if it's
epistemically possible either that the AI is a person or that it falls far
short of personhood. Debatable personhood is a likely outcome of AI development
and might arise soon. Debatable AI personhood throws us into a catastrophic
moral dilemma: Either treat the systems as moral persons and risk sacrificing
real human interests for the sake of entities without interests worth the
sacrifice, or don't treat the systems as moral persons and risk perpetrating
grievous moral wrongs against them. The moral issues become even more
perplexing if we consider cases of possibly conscious AI that are subhuman,
superhuman, or highly divergent from us in their morally relevant properties.

人工智能系统可能拥有有争议的人格，这将导致道德困境，如果将这些系统视为具有道德人格，则可能会牺牲真正的人类利益，但不将其视为道德人格可能会对其造成严重的道德伤害，而拥有意识的人工智能系统的情况将更加错综复杂。

有待讨论的人格 AI 系统的全面权利困境

The Full Rights Dilemma for A.I. Systems of Debatable Personhood

In the r/AmITheAsshole subreddit, people anonymously share first person
narratives that contain some moral dilemma or conflict and ask the community to
judge who is at fault (i.e., who is "the asshole"). In general, first person
narratives are a unique storytelling domain where the author is the narrator
(the person telling the story) but can also be a character (the person living
the story) and, thus, the author has two distinct voices presented in the
story. In this study, we identify linguistic and narrative features associated
with the author as the character or as a narrator. We use these features to
answer the following questions: (1) what makes an asshole character and (2)
what makes an asshole narrator? We extract both Author-as-Character features
(e.g., demographics, narrative event chain, and emotional arc) and
Author-as-Narrator features (i.e., the style and emotion of the story as a
whole) in order to identify which aspects of the narrative are correlated with
the final moral judgment. Our work shows that "assholes" as Characters frame
themselves as lacking agency with a more positive personal arc, while
"assholes" as Narrators will tell emotional and opinionated stories.

研究人员通过分析 r/AmITheAsshole 中的语言和叙事特点，确定了角色与叙述者的共性和区别，探究了导致道德判断的因素。结果表明，对于角色而言，缺乏能动性与积极个人历程会导致判断为 “asshole”；对于叙述者而言，情感发泄和主观观点会使故事更具说服力。