Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in
applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task
planning; adoption that has fueled a wealth of new models such as LLaVa,
InstructBLIP, and PaLI-3. Despite the volume of new releases, key design
decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are
under-explored, making it challenging to understand what factors account for
model performance $-$ a challenge further complicated by the lack of objective,
consistent evaluations. To address these gaps, we first compile a suite of
standardized evaluations spanning visual question answering, object
localization from language, and targeted challenge sets that probe properties
such as hallucination; evaluations that provide calibrated, fine-grained
insight into a VLM's capabilities. Second, we rigorously investigate VLMs along
key design axes, including pretrained visual representations and quantifying
the tradeoffs of using base vs. instruct-tuned language models, amongst others.
We couple our analysis with three resource contributions: (1) a unified
framework for evaluating VLMs, (2) optimized, flexible code for VLM training,
and (3) checkpoints for all models, including a family of VLMs at the 7-13B
scale that strictly outperform InstructBLIP and LLaVa v1.5, the
state-of-the-art in open-source VLMs.

通过一系列标准化评估和深入研究，提供了视觉相关语言模型 (VLMs) 的能力和设计决策，包括图像预处理、架构和优化等方面的细致洞察。