This paper investigates the relationship between law and eXplainable
Artificial Intelligence (XAI). While there is much discussion about the AI Act,
for which the trilogue of the European Parliament, Council and Commission
recently concluded, other areas of law seem underexplored. This paper focuses
on European (and in part German) law, although with international concepts and
regulations such as fiduciary plausibility checks, the General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR), and product safety and liability. Based on XAI-taxonomies,
requirements for XAI-methods are derived from each of the legal bases,
resulting in the conclusion that each legal basis requires different XAI
properties and that the current state of the art does not fulfill these to full
satisfaction, especially regarding the correctness (sometimes called fidelity)
and confidence estimates of XAI-methods.

该研究探讨了法律与可解释人工智能（XAI）之间的关系，通过对欧洲法律、AI 法案以及 XAI 方法的要求等方面的研究，得出法律对不同的 XAI 属性有不同的要求，并指出现有技术水平尚不能充分满足这些要求，尤其是在 XAI 方法的正确性和置信度估计方面。